SCS-C03 Exam Questions 2026 – Practice Test with Verified Answers

Home / Amazon / SCS-C03

Latest SCS-C03 Exam Practice Questions

The practice questions for SCS-C03 exam was last updated on 2026-08-23 .

Viewing page 1 out of 7 pages.

Viewing questions 1 out of 35 questions.

Question#1

A security team manages a company’s AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) customer managed keys. Only members of the security team can administer the KMS keys. The company's application team has a software process that needs temporary access to the keys occasionally. The security team needs to provide the application team's software process with access to the keys.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

A. Export the KMS key material to an on-premises hardware security module (HSM). Give the application team access to the key material.
B. Edit the key policy that grants the security team access to the KMS keys by adding the application team as principals. Revert this change when the application team no longer needs access.
C. Create a key grant to allow the application team to use the KMS keys. Revoke the grant when the application team no longer needs access.
D. Create a new KMS key by generating key material on premises. Import the key material to AWS KMS whenever the application team needs access. Grant the application team permissions to use the key.

Explanation:
AWS KMS key grants are specifically designed to provide temporary, granular permissions to use customer managed keys without modifying key policies. According to the AWS Certified Security C Specialty Study Guide, grants are the preferred mechanism for delegating key usage permissions to AWS principals for short-term or programmatic access scenarios. Grants allow permissions such as Encrypt, Decrypt, or GenerateDataKey and can be created and revoked dynamically.
Using a key grant avoids the operational risk and overhead of editing key policies, which are long-term control mechanisms and should remain stable. AWS documentation emphasizes that frequent key policy changes increase the risk of misconfiguration and accidental privilege escalation. Grants can be revoked immediately when access is no longer required, ensuring strong adherence to the principle of least privilege.
Options A and D violate AWS security best practices because AWS KMS does not allow direct export of key material unless the key was explicitly created as an importable key, and exporting key material increases exposure risk.
Option B requires manual policy changes and rollback, which introduces operational overhead and audit complexity.
AWS recommends key grants as the most efficient and secure way to provide temporary access to KMS keys for applications.
Referenced AWS Specialty Documents:
AWS Certified Security C Specialty Official Study Guide AWS KMS Key Policies and Grants Documentation AWS KMS Best Practices

Question#2

A company sends Apache logs from EC2 Auto Scaling instances to a CloudWatch Logs log group with 1-year retention. A suspicious IP address appears in logs. A security engineer needs to analyze the past week of logs to count requests from that IP and list requested URLs.
What should the engineer do with the LEAST effort?

A. Export to S3 and use Macie.
B. Stream to OpenSearch and analyze.
C. Use CloudWatch Logs Insights with queries.
D. Export to S3 and use AWS Glue.

Explanation:
CloudWatch Logs Insights is a managed, on-demand query capability designed to search and analyze log data stored in CloudWatch Logs without moving the data elsewhere. AWS Certified Security C Specialty documentation highlights Logs Insights as the lowest-effort method for rapid investigations, because it supports filtering, parsing, aggregation, and time-range queries directly over existing log groups. In this scenario, the logs already exist in CloudWatch Logs with sufficient retention. The engineer can write a query that filters for the suspicious IP address, counts occurrences over the last 7 days, and extracts requested URLs using parsing functions. This satisfies both requirements (count and URLs) immediately, without building pipelines or exporting data.
Option B adds operational overhead by provisioning and maintaining OpenSearch ingestion and indexing.
Options A and D require exporting data and additional services that are not necessary for a one-week forensic query. Therefore, Logs Insights is the most efficient and cost-effective approach .
Referenced AWS Specialty Documents:
AWS Certified Security C Specialty Official Study Guide
Amazon CloudWatch Logs Insights Querying and Investigation Workflows

Question#3

A company’s security policy requires all Amazon EC2 instances to use the Amazon Time Sync Service. AWS CloudTrail trails are enabled in all of the company’s AWS accounts. VPC Flow Logs are enabled for all VPCs.
A security engineer must identify any EC2 instances that attempt to use Network Time Protocol (NTP) servers on the internet.
Which solution will meet these requirements?

A. Monitor CloudTrail logs for API calls to non-standard time servers.
B. Monitor CloudTrail logs for API calls to the Amazon Time Sync Service.
C. Monitor VPC Flow Logs for traffic to non-standard time servers.
D. Monitor VPC Flow Logs for traffic to the Amazon Time Sync Service.

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed 100to 150 words of Explanation From AWS Certified Security C Specialty topics:
NTP traffic is network traffic, not an AWS API call. CloudTrail records AWS API activity, so it cannot identify an EC2 instance contacting an external NTP server on UDP port 123. VPC Flow Logs capture information about IP traffic going to and from network interfaces in a VPC, including source, destination, protocol, ports, and accept/reject status. Therefore, the correct approach is to analyze VPC Flow Logs for outbound NTP traffic to destinations other than the Amazon Time Sync Service. Monitoring traffic to the Amazon Time Sync Service would show compliant behavior, not violations. This is a detection-control question: use CloudTrail for API activity and VPC Flow Logs for network-level traffic visibility.

Question#4

A company's security team wants to receive email notification from AWS about any abuse reports regarding DoS attacks. A security engineer needs to implement a solution that will provide a near-real-time alert for any abuse reports that AWS sends for the account. The security engineer already has created an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic and has subscribed the security team's email address to the topic.
What should the security engineer do next to meet these requirements?

A. Use the AWS Trusted Advisor API and a scheduled Lambda function to detect AWS_ABUSE_DOS_REPORT notifications.
B. Create an Amazon EventBridge rule that uses AWS Health and identifies a specific event for AWS_ABUSE_DOS_REPOR
C. Configure the rule action to publish a message to the SNS topic.
D. Use the AWS Support API and a scheduled Lambda function to detect abuse report cases.
E. Use AWS CloudTrail logs with metric filters to detect AWS_ABUSE_DOS_REPORT events.

Explanation:
AWS Health provides real-time visibility into events that affect AWS accounts, including abuse notifications such as AWS_ABUSE_DOS_REPORT. According to the AWS Certified Security C Specialty Study Guide, AWS Health events are natively integrated with Amazon EventBridge, enabling automated, near-real-time responses without polling or custom code.
By creating an EventBridge rule that listens for AWS Health events related to abuse reports and configuring the rule to publish messages to an SNS topic, the security engineer ensures immediate notification to the security team whenever AWS issues a DoS-related abuse report for the account.
Option A and C rely on periodic polling using Lambda functions, which introduces latency and operational complexity.
Option D is incorrect because CloudTrail does not log AWS abuse notifications.
AWS documentation explicitly identifies AWS Health + EventBridge + SNSas the recommended architecture for near-real-time operational and security alerts originating from AWS.
AWS Certified Security C Specialty Official Study Guide
AWS Health User Guide
Amazon EventBridge Documentation
AWS Incident Response Best Practices

Question#5

A company runs workloads in an AWS account. A security engineer observes some unusual findings in Amazon Guard Duty. The security engineer wants to investigate a specific IAM role and generate an investigation report. The report must contain details about anomalous behavior and any indicators of compromise.
Which solution will meet these requirements?

A. Use Amazon Detective to perform an investigation on the IAM role.
B. Use AWS Audit Manager to create an assessment. Specify the IAM role. Run an assessment report.
C. Use Amazon Inspector to create an assessment. Specify the IAM role. Run an assessment report.
D. Use Amazon Inspector to run an on-demand scan of the IAM role.

Explanation:
Amazon Detective is a purpose-built AWS service designed to analyze, investigate, and visualize security data to help identify the root cause of suspicious or malicious activity. According to the AWS Certified Security C Specialty Official Study Guide, Amazon Detective directly integrates with Amazon GuardDuty findings, AWS CloudTrail logs, Amazon VPC Flow Logs, and Amazon EKS audit logs to automatically create behavior graphs and timelines.
When GuardDuty generates findings related to anomalous activity, Amazon Detective enables security engineers to pivot directly to an investigation focused on a specific IAM role, user, or resource. Detective automatically correlates historical activity, identifies deviations from baseline behavior, and highlights indicators of compromise, such as unusual API calls, credential misuse, or suspicious network activity.
AWS Audit Manager (Option B) is designed for compliance and audit evidence collection, not threat investigation. Amazon Inspector (Options C and D) is focused on vulnerability scanning of compute resources and does not analyze IAM behavior or GuardDuty findings. AWS documentation explicitly states that Amazon Detective is the recommended service for deep-dive investigations following GuardDuty alerts, providing enriched context and investigation reports for security incidents.
AWS Certified Security C Specialty Official Study Guide
Amazon Detective User Guide
Amazon GuardDuty Integration Documentation

Disclaimer

This page is for educational and exam preparation reference only. It is not affiliated with Amazon, Certified Security Specialty, or the official exam provider. Candidates should refer to official documentation and training for authoritative information.

Exam Code: SCS-C03Q & A:  231  Q&As Updated:  2026-08-23

  Get All SCS-C03 Q&As